Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 40 (0.27 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income-Tax Vidarbha vs Godavaridevi Saraf on 27 September, 1977

It should not be overlooked that the Income-tax Act is an All-India stature and if an Income-tax Tribunal in Madras, in view of the decision of the Madras High Court, has to proceed on the footing that section 140A(3) was non-existent, the order of penalty there-under cannot be imposed by the authority under the Act. Until a contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the State of Bombay, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the final law of the land. When the Tribunal set aside the order of penalty it did not go into the question of intra vires or ultra vires. It did not go into the question of constitutionality of section 140A(3). That section was already declared ultra vires by a competent High Court in the country and an authority like an Income-tax Tribunal acting anywhere in the country has to respect the law laid down by the High Court, though of a different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court on that question."
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 198 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs M/S Itc Ltd. on 4 April, 2016

"Ground no. 6 is on the exclusion of tax or duty in the computation of TP of power for computing deduction u/s 80(a)(ia) of the Act. This issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the decisions of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2005-06. The ld. DR, relied on the order of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Kolkata - III v. ITC Ltd. [2015] 64 taxmann.com 214 (Calcutta). This Bench of the Tribunal has considered this issue and in its order dt. 09/11/2016, ITA 399/Kol/2008 for Assessment Year 2004-05 & ITA No. 538/Kol/2008 for the Assessment Year 2004-05, has at para 6, held as follows:-
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next