Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.28 seconds)
General Manager, Bank Of Baroda vs Ashok Kumar Singh on 29 May, 2026 cites

Dipti Prakash Banerjee vs Satvendra Nath Bose National Centre For ... on 10 February, 1999

“11. An order of termination simpliciter passed during the period of probation has been generating undying debate. The recent two decisions of this Court in Dipti Prakash Banerjee v. Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Calcutta [(1999) 3 SCC 60] and Pavanendra Narayan Verma v. Sanjay Gandhi PGI of Medical Sciences [(2002) 1 SCC 520] after survey of most of the earlier decisions touching the question observed as to when an order of termination can be treated as simpliciter and when it can be treated as punitive and when a stigma is said to be attached to an employee discharged during the period of probation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 500 - M J Rao - Full Document

Parshotam Lal Dhingra vs Union Of India on 1 November, 1957

15. In relation to the disciplinary proceedings, Mr. Banerjee, learned ASG submits that the Respondent No. 1 vide letter dated 24.11.2005 was informed that the proceedings have been kept in 8 abeyance in view of the termination order. Lastly, it is submitted that there was sufficient material on record including confidential reports, contemporaneous records and communication regarding deficiencies in discharge of duties on the basis of which competent authority formed an opinion that Respondent No. 1 was unfit for confirmation in service. Hence, Regulation 16(3)(a) of 1982 Regulations was rightly invoked and the present appeal deserves to be allowed. To buttress the submissions, Mr. Banerjee, learned ASG has placed reliance on Parshotam Lal Dhingra vs. Union of India3, Dipti Prakash Banerjee vs. Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre for Basis Sciences, Calcutta and Others4, Pavanendra Narayan Verma vs. Sanjay Gandhi PGI of Medical Sciences & Anr.5, Mathew P. Thomas vs. Kerala State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. & Ors.6, State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Jaswant Singh7.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 809 - Full Document

Kamal Kishore Lakshman vs Management Of Pan American World ... on 3 December, 1986

27. As to what amounts to stigma has been considered in Kamal Kishore Lakshman v. Pan American World Airways Inc. [(1987) 1 SCC 146] This Court explained the meaning of “stigma” as follows: (SCC p. 150, para 8) “8. According to Webster's New World Dictionary, it (stigma) is something that detracts from the character or reputation of a person, a mark, sign etc. indicating that something is not considered normal or standard. The Legal Thesaurus by Burton gives the meaning of the word to be blemish, defect, disgrace, disrepute, imputation, mark of disgrace or shame. The Webster's Third New International Dictionary gives the meaning as a mark or label indicating a deviation from a norm. According to yet another dictionary ‘stigma’ is a matter for moral reproach.” Point 3
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 115 - R B Misra - Full Document

The State Of Punjab & Others vs Jaswant Singh on 22 March, 2010

15. In relation to the disciplinary proceedings, Mr. Banerjee, learned ASG submits that the Respondent No. 1 vide letter dated 24.11.2005 was informed that the proceedings have been kept in 8 abeyance in view of the termination order. Lastly, it is submitted that there was sufficient material on record including confidential reports, contemporaneous records and communication regarding deficiencies in discharge of duties on the basis of which competent authority formed an opinion that Respondent No. 1 was unfit for confirmation in service. Hence, Regulation 16(3)(a) of 1982 Regulations was rightly invoked and the present appeal deserves to be allowed. To buttress the submissions, Mr. Banerjee, learned ASG has placed reliance on Parshotam Lal Dhingra vs. Union of India3, Dipti Prakash Banerjee vs. Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre for Basis Sciences, Calcutta and Others4, Pavanendra Narayan Verma vs. Sanjay Gandhi PGI of Medical Sciences & Anr.5, Mathew P. Thomas vs. Kerala State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. & Ors.6, State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Jaswant Singh7.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document

Sarita vs The Registrar General, Rajasthan High ... on 11 March, 2022

In this context, reference is drawn to the judgment of this Court in Sarita Choudhary v. High Court of M.P.8, wherein this Court in a challenge to the termination of female judicial officers serving their probation in the Madhya Pradesh State Judicial Service based on adverse Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and alleged unsatisfactory performance, observed as thus:
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1