Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.19 seconds)

Mostt. Simrikhia vs Smt. Dolley Mukherjee @ Smt. ... on 2 March, 1990

5. The objection of the opposite part as to the maintainability of the present application should first of all be disposed of. The petitioners had as in the instant petition, jointly challenged the impugned order of cognizance earlier by preferring Criminal Misc. No. 13772 of 1992 which was admitted on 13-5-93. The same was laid before a learned Single Judge of this Court for hearing on 10-1-94, but it was dismissed for default. The petitioners had then preferred a restoration application which was registered as Criminal Misc. No. 645/94, to recall the said order dated 10-1-94 and to restore Criminal Misc. No, 13772/92 to its original file, which was also dismissed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by order dated 2 -2-94 (Annexure-1). Relying on the provisions of Section 362 of the Code as well as the Judgment of the Supreme Court Simrikhia v. Dolley Mukherjee, learned Counsel for the O.P. submitted that the inherent powers cannot be exercised by this Court to review its own judgment. I am unable to accede to this contention. Section 362 of the Code reads as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 138 - M F Beevi - Full Document
1   2 Next