cites: 21672579

Surinder Singh & Ors vs State Of H.P. & Anr on 1 January, 2020

In the interregnum, some of the aggrieved persons whose adhoc services were not counted for the purpose of regularisation approached this Court by way of CWP No. 372 of 1985 titled as Surinder Kumar and others vs. State of H.P. and another, wherein this Court on 04.03.1986 passed the following directions:

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 9 - C B Barowalia - Full Document

Bhola @ Paras Ram vs State Of H.P on 18 February, 2009

7. Further a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 36 of 2010 titled Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. and others, decided on 15.7.2010 after placing reliance upon Paras Ram's case (supra) held that "It is also settled principle of law that any service that is counted for the purpose of increment, will count for pension also.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 153 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Sita Ram vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 16 August, 2016

7. Further a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 36 of 2010 titled Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. and others, decided on 15.7.2010 after placing reliance upon Paras Ram's case (supra) held that "It is also settled principle of law that any service that is counted for the purpose of increment, will count for pension also.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 135 - S Sharma - Full Document

Prem Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Secretary on 2 September, 2019

In a recent decision rendered by three Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Prem Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others AIR 2019 SC 4390, it was held that the services rendered on contract basis followed by regular ::: Downloaded on - 26/02/2020 20:23:44 :::HCHP 7 appointment have to be counted towards qualifying service for the purpose of pension. It shall be apposite to refer to the .

Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 898 - A Mishra - Full Document

Kedar Singh Negi vs H.P. High Court And Others on 7 January, 2020

15. Similar reiteration of law can be found in a judgment rendered by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.3267 of 2019, titled Ram Krishan Sharma vs. The Accountant General (A&E), HP and Ors., decided on 01.01.2020 and a very recent judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 537 of 2018, titled Kedar Singh Negi vs. H.P. High Court and others, decided on 07.01.2020.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 8 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Narayan Dutt Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 19 February, 2018

In Narain Dutt Sharma & Ors. v. State of Uttar .

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search