Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (5.59 seconds)

Suo Moto vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors on 12 December, 2011

During the hearing it was not disputed before us that the State of Rajasthan, Water Resources Department itself after the judgment of the Hon‟ble High Court of Rajasthan in the case of Suo- Motu vs. State of Rajasthan as well as of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab and even prior to that in 2002 vide a circular no. 03/2002 on the subject „technical specifications and directions of anicut construction‟ has dealt with the aforesaid issues with regard to the construction of anicuts their location and specifications. In this connection we would like to reiterate the concern expressed by the Learned Commissioner that the area in question has fractured lithography where the anicuts would be fatal for the water body as these would stop the inflow of water from the catchment area completely. In the light of the above observations and findings of the Learned Commissioner and also material placed before us in the form of the two maps which has been appended to the commissioner report, we are prima facie of the view and which is also shared by all the parties concern that the primary concern and responsibility of all has to be saving and protecting and ensuring the safety of the Shakti Sagar Lake.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 29 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Jagpal Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 28 January, 2011

During the hearing it was not disputed before us that the State of Rajasthan, Water Resources Department itself after the judgment of the Hon‟ble High Court of Rajasthan in the case of Suo- Motu vs. State of Rajasthan as well as of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab and even prior to that in 2002 vide a circular no. 03/2002 on the subject „technical specifications and directions of anicut construction‟ has dealt with the aforesaid issues with regard to the construction of anicuts their location and specifications. In this connection we would like to reiterate the concern expressed by the Learned Commissioner that the area in question has fractured lithography where the anicuts would be fatal for the water body as these would stop the inflow of water from the catchment area completely. In the light of the above observations and findings of the Learned Commissioner and also material placed before us in the form of the two maps which has been appended to the commissioner report, we are prima facie of the view and which is also shared by all the parties concern that the primary concern and responsibility of all has to be saving and protecting and ensuring the safety of the Shakti Sagar Lake.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 964 - M Katju - Full Document
1