Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 7 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 161 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Janardan Reddy And Others vs The State Of Hyderabad And ... on 16 March, 1951
In Janardan Reddy v. The State, , it was held that the High Court of Hyderabad before 26-1-1950, was not a High Court within the territory of India for the purposes of the Constitution and that being so, no question of grant of any certificate would arise at all. Their Lordships in AIR 1951 Hyd 98 having regard to Article 374 of the Constitution and the judgment in the Supreme Court case cited above, observed that Article 374 (4) of the Constitution abolishes the jurisdiction of the Privy Council of the Hyderabad State after the Constitution of India came into force and that that body and its jurisdiction altogether ceased to exist.
Neti Anjaneyalu vs Sri Venugopal Rice Mill (Limited) on 11 January, 1922
In that case the objection raised was that the land in question was service inam and not alienable, and consequently the Court had no jurisdiction to pass a decree. After referring to the several decisions i.e., Anjaneyalu v. Sri Venugopala Rice Mills Ltd., ILR 45 Mad 620; (AIR 1922 Mad 197) (FB); and Katwari v. Sita Ram Tiwari, ILR 43 All 547: (AIR 1921 All 1118) (FB), Walsh, J. observed at page 363 as follows :