Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.33 seconds)Section 108 in Cantonments Act, 1924 [Entire Act]
Hari Om Gautam vs District Magistrate, Mathura & Anr on 27 March, 1987
In the case of Hari Om Gautam, (supra), the validity of an order dated May 22, 1986 passed by the District Magistrate, Mathura declaring certain plots in the town area as a bus stand was under challenge. The Supreme Court held that a bus stand can only be notified by the Regional Transport Authority having jurisdiction over the area. The power of District Magistrate is confined to the question of determination of parking places and halting places which are not the same as bus stand which can only be notified by the Regional Transport Authority.
Section 96 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 61 in Cantonments Act, 1924 [Entire Act]
Dinesh Kumar Yadav vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 27 July, 1999
The Patna High Court in the case of Dinesh Kumar Yadav (supra) taking into consideration the relevant provisions, namely, Sections 96 and 117 of the M.V. Act. 1988 and Rules 187, 191 and 214 of the Rule, 1994, gave similar finding and held that the Regional Transport Authority is only competent to designate a bus stand and the District Magistrate is empowered to identify parking zone/places.
1