1. D.B.Civil Writ Petition ... vs State Of Rajasthan & Others. on 11 August, 2015
Petitioners happened to be employees of Rural Electric Cooperative Society, Todabhim, District Karauli, which was part of erstwhile Rajasthan State Electricity Board. Earlier they filed writ petitions, being S.B. Civil Writ Petitions No.4391/1992, 4390/1992, 4527/1992 and 4331/1992, which came to be decided vide judgments dated 19.03.1996, 29.01.1996 and 31.01.1997, directing regularization of their services with effect from 19.03.1996 and 31.01.1997. Thereafter the erstwhile RSEB was divided into five companies, one being Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited. When services of petitioners have not been regularized by respondents, petitioners, along-with other persons, filed Writ Petition No.6614/1998 Jaldhari and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others, which came to be dismissed vide order dated 25.09.2001 holding that license of erstwhile Todabhim Rural Cooperative Society was cancelled on 20.02.1995, which was prior to judgment of this court in earlier writ petitions. The respondent Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited absorbed other junior employees and refused to extend similar treatment to petitioners. Some of petitioners herein, who were petitioners in earlier writ petitions, filed Special Appeal (Writ) No.309/2002, which came to be allowed by a Division Bench of this court vide judgment dated 18.11.2010 holding that as the State Government was already a party to that case and all orders of absorption etc. have been passed in compliance of order passed by the State Government and further as the process of absorption of the employees of the erstwhile Todabhim Cooperative Society was going on when the judgments of this court delivered in 1996/1997 in earlier writ petition filed in the year 1992, respondents were bound by the judgment of this court. Despite that, respondents have not considered petitioners for regularization in the light of judgment dated 18.11.2010 and therefore petitioners served a notice for demand of justice dated 14.02.2011 upon the respondents but that too is also of no avail.