Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.37 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 80 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Sh. Ranbir Singh vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 30 June, 2009
In view of my aforesaid discussion I hereby hold
that the plaintiff is not entitled to the damages/ compensation
of any counts except on the account of loss of pay and
50
allowance for the promotional post of Sub Inspector for the
period 29.6.2005 to 26.9.2006 in terms of the directions of the
Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal in OA no. 2299/05 under
Ranbir Singh Vs. Govt of NCT of Delhi'.
Section 140 in Delhi Police Act, 1978 [Entire Act]
Sh. Rajesh Chaudhary vs Nirmala Chaudhary on 9 November, 2005
After reaching
near the office of the Sub Inspector, Sh. V.K. Chaudhary and
independent witnesses Sh. Mange Ram were directed by the
trap laying officer to proceed in front of the office of the Sub
Inspector and call up the plaintiff requesting him to meet in
front of his office. The plaintiff insisted on his coming
inside his office but Sh. V.K. Chaudhary showed his
17
unwillingness to go inside the office and the matter was
deferred for a day or two. It is stated that Sh. V.K. Chaudhary
produced the recorded conversation to CBI Office and the
CFSL confirmed the voice of Sub Inspector Ranbir Singh
plaintiff in the recorded conversation. Sh. V. K. Chaudhary
was finally arrested by him when he got suspicious about Sh.
V.K. Chaudhary and it was alleged that the plaintiff was
trying to obtain the illegal gratification of Rs.1.20 lakhs from
Sh. V.K. Chaudhary for not arresting him in the said case and
he did not arrest Sh. V.K. Chaudhary on 9.03.2004 when there
were grounds and no fresh grounds emerged after that.
Ex. Constable Ranbir Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 10 July, 2001
Announced in the open court (Dr. KAMINI LAU)
Dated: 11.12.2009 Addl. District Judge: Delhi
51
Ranbir Singh Vs. Union of India
CS No. 129/2007
11.12.2009
Present: Plaintiff in person.
1