Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Motilal Giri vs Aiims, Bhubaneswar on 14 November, 2025 cites

The Cpio, Supreme Court Of India, Tilak ... vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. on 2 September, 2009

5. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, observes that in both cases, the CPIO has provided available information to the Appellant/Complainant vide letters dated 16.08.2024 and 11.06.2024. As regards, answer sheet of third parties, the attention of the Appellant/Complainant is drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil Appeal No. 10045 of Page 5 of 7 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1 SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & amp; Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794. The following was thus held:
Delhi High Court Cites 77 - Cited by 2336 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Canara Bank vs C.S. Shyam . on 31 August, 2017

5. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, observes that in both cases, the CPIO has provided available information to the Appellant/Complainant vide letters dated 16.08.2024 and 11.06.2024. As regards, answer sheet of third parties, the attention of the Appellant/Complainant is drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil Appeal No. 10045 of Page 5 of 7 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1 SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & amp; Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794. The following was thus held:
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 1915 - A M Sapre - Full Document

Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs Cen.Information Commr.& Ors on 3 October, 2012

5. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, observes that in both cases, the CPIO has provided available information to the Appellant/Complainant vide letters dated 16.08.2024 and 11.06.2024. As regards, answer sheet of third parties, the attention of the Appellant/Complainant is drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil Appeal No. 10045 of Page 5 of 7 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1 SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & amp; Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794. The following was thus held:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3119 - Full Document

Petitioner No. 6 For Placing On Record ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 14 December, 2020

5. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, observes that in both cases, the CPIO has provided available information to the Appellant/Complainant vide letters dated 16.08.2024 and 11.06.2024. As regards, answer sheet of third parties, the attention of the Appellant/Complainant is drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil Appeal No. 10045 of Page 5 of 7 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1 SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & amp; Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794. The following was thus held:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 291 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1