Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.34 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 299 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shivasharanappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 7 May, 2013
3. Shivasharanappa and Others Vs. State
of Karnataka reported in (2013) 5 SCC
705 [Shivasharanappa] paragraph Nos.19
and 22.
Santhu @ Santhosh Poojary vs State Of Karnataka By on 15 December, 2020
5. Santhu @ Santosh Poojary Vs. State of
Karnataka in Crl.A. No.880/2015
paragraph Nos.2, 52 and 53.
Arjun And Anr. Etc. Etc vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 February, 2017
6. Arjun and Another Vs. State of
Chhattisgarh reported in (2017) 3 SCC
247 paragraph Nos.19 to 24. (Exception IV
to 300 of IPC).
Gopal Singh & Ors vs State Of M.P on 12 May, 2010
In Gopal Singh v. State of M.P. this
Court did not agree with the High Court which
had accepted the statement of an alleged
eyewitness as his conduct was unnatural and
while so holding, it observed as follows: (SCC
p. 413, para 25)
"25. We also find that the High Court
has accepted the statement of Feran
Singh, PW 5 as the eyewitness of the
incident ignoring the fact that his
behaviour was unnatural as he claimed
to have rushed to the village but had still
not conveyed the information about the
incident to his parents and others
present there and had chosen to
disappear for a couple of hours on the
specious and unacceptable plea that he
feared for his own safety."
Dauvaram Nirmalkar vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 2 August, 2022
24. In the present case, the cause of the
incident is not spoken to by any of the witnesses,
however, P.Ws.1, 2 and 8 have categorically stated
about the quarrel that took place on the date of the
incident and the accused has stabbed the deceased
with weapon M.O.1-Bharji which, he often carries
along with him to his farm every time. Thus, it is a
case, where the accused, in the heat of argument lost
his self control and sudden provocation caused the
death of the deceased and it is nothing but culpable
homicide not amounting to murder and therefore, falls
under Exception I of Section 300 of IPC. The Apex
Court in the case of Dauvaram Nirmalkar Vs. State
of Chhattisgarh reported in AIR 2022 SC 3620 at
paragraph Nos.9 to 13 held as under: