Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.18 seconds)
Union Of India vs Aircel Limited And Anr on 23 February, 2012 cites

The Special Director And Anr vs Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse And Anr on 9 January, 2004

16. Mr. Chandhiok, learned ASG submitted that except recording the fact that the matter was heard at length, no reasons are given while passing the stay order dated 24.12.2011. Such an order, it was submitted, is perverse and non est. His further submission was that same error has crept in the order dated 17.2.2012. Further submission of learned ASG is that merely because the petitioner had agreed that the matter be heard finally would not mean that while passing the stay order or continuing with the order, the Tribunal was not supposed to give its reasons in support of such an order, more particularly when it was accepted that matter was heard at length which would mean that various contentions were raised by the petitioner in support and in justification of the order dated 23.12.2011 impugned in the petitions before the Tribunal, asking the respondents to stop the user of those services. Learned ASG referred to a judgment of the Supreme Court in Special Director & Anr. v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse & Anr., (2004) 3 SCC 440, wherein the interim order passed by the High Court without giving any reasons was set aside.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 952 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next