cites: 22607829

Deepak Mohan Sethi Etc Etc vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd And Ors Etc on 13 October, 2014

"8. In the present case the workman had not raised any contention that the contract entered into between the contractor and the management was a sham. In fact the contention of the workman was that he was an employee of the respondent. The Labour Court could not have gone into Deepak Kumar v. BSES & Ors.

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 2325

Employers In Relation To The Management ... vs The Presiding Officer, Central ... on 8 July, 1988

and Ors. etc JT 1996(11) SC 170. Even the observations of Hon'ble Patna High Court in Employers in Relation to... Vs. Presiding Officer, Central 1999 (47) BLJR 2105 were based on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United Labour Unions and Ors. etc JT 1996(11) SC 170 and in Secretary, Haryana State Electricity Board's case (Supra).

Patna High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 17 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Air India Statutory Corporation vs United Labour Union & Ors on 6 November, 1996

51. It is significant to note in this regard that the observation of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Air India Statutory Corporation Vs. United Labour Unions and Ors. etc JT 1996(11) SC 170, relied upon in Secretary, Haryana State Electricity Board's case (Supra) have been specifically overruled by a larger bench of Hon'ble of Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Ors. Vs. National Union Waterfront Workers & Ors. (2001)7 SCC 1.

Supreme Court of India Cites 118 - Cited by 420 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 66100

Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 15497

Steel Authority Of India Ltd. & Ors. ... vs National Union Water Front Workers & Ors on 30 August, 2001

As regards extent of control and supervision, we have already taken note of the observations in Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills case [Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills v. Bharat Lal, (2011) 1 SCC 635 : (2011) 1 SCC (L&S) 16] , International Airport Authority of India case [International Airport Authority of India v. International Air Cargo Workers' Union, (2009) 13 SCC 374 : (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 257] and Nalco case [NALCO Ltd. v. Ananta Kishore Deepak Kumar v. BSES & Ors.

Supreme Court of India Cites 96 - Cited by 748 - Full Document

Section 23 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 206

Section 25 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 154

Suo-Moto Case No. 01/2010 (In Re: Sugar ... vs 2.2.1 National Federation Of ... on 30 November, 2011

15. However, according to management no. 3, it had been able to keep the promise only in respect of 32 workers by procuring job for them, whereas, some of the workers did not agree to join on the ground that the job was not being offered with management no. 1. Management no. 3 has undertaken to give jobs to all the remaining workers while denying all the allegations regarding adoption of any unfair labour practice. Management no. 3 has also denied the allegations of the workman that he was not provided with any appointment letter or other statutory benefits. It is alleged by management no. 3 that the workman was duly issued the appointment letter, was paid his wages regularly and PF and ESI deductions were duly made by management no. 3 from his salary. Management no. 3 has denied the claim of the workman that it had terminated the services of the workman in violation of provisions of Section 25F, G Deepak Kumar v. BSES & Ors.

Competition Commission of India Cites 25 - Cited by 400 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results