Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Annie Abraham vs The Secretary Department Of Personnel ... on 20 October, 2022 cites

Smt. Alka Srivastava Wife Of Late Rajesh ... vs Union Of India Through Its Secretary on 27 May, 2011

Similarly, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench in the matter of Smt. Rajesh Kumari v Union of India and others [O.A No. 888/CH/2013] had held in its order dated 25.04.2017 that since no salary was paid to the applicant therein for the period of Extra Ordinary Leave (EOL) that period has to be excluded for counting of qualifying service for the grant of benefit of financial upgradation.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors. vs Sh.Ashok Kumar Arora on 26 April, 2011

9. Clarifying the action taken by the them the respondents have further submitted that the applicant has been informed by the impugned order at Annexure A6 that the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Union of India & others v Ashok Kumar Sharma [2011 (13) SCC 2] in civil appeal No. 568 of 2011 had ruled that, if an employee availed Extra Ordinary Leave (EOL) for private purpose without salary then such period is to be excluded for the purpose of computing qualifying service for grant of financial upgradation.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - A Kumar - Full Document

Uoi.Th.Minis.Of Communication And ... vs Ashok Kumar Sharma on 4 November, 2013

17. Therefore, since no salary was paid to the applicant for the period of EOL of 548 days and no protest has been raised by her at any stage, so that period has to be excluded for counting the qualifying service for the grant of benefit of 2 nd ACP and the contrary arguments of learned counsel for the applicant are hereby repelled in view of ratio of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Ashok Kumar Sharma's case (supra), wherein it was ruled that if any employee availed EOL for private purpose, without salary, then such period is to be excluded for the purpose of computing qualifying service for grant of financial upgradation. The ratio of law laid down is mutatis mutandis applicable to the instant controversy and is complete answer to the problem in hand."
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - H Massodi - Full Document
1