Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.27 seconds)
Ms. Pooja Khatri And Ors. vs Delhi University & Ors. on 11 May, 2018 cites

The University Of Mysore And Anr vs C. D. Govinda Rao And Anr on 26 August, 1963

"27. Undoubtedly, the Court lacks expertise especially in disputes relating to policies of pure academic educational matters. Therefore, generally it should abide by the opinion of the Expert Body. The Constitution Bench of this Court in The University of Mysore & Anr. v. C.D. Govinda Rao & Anr., AIR 1965 SC 491 held that "normally the courts should be slow to interfere with the opinions expressed by the experts".
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 754 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Km. Neelima Misra vs Dr. Harinder Kaur Paintal And Ors on 21 March, 1990

It would normally be wise and safe for the courts to leave such decisions to experts who are more familiar with the problems they face than the courts generally can be. This view has consistently been reiterated by this Court in Km. Neelima Misra v. Dr. Harinder Kaur Paintal & Ors., AIR 1990 SC 1402; The Secretary & Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall v. Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity & Ors., AIR 2010 SC 1285; Dr. Basavaiah v. Dr. H.L. Ramesh & Ors., (2010) 8 SCC 372; and State of H.P. & Ors. v. H.P. Nizi Vyavsayik Prishikshan Kendra Sangh, (2011) 6 SCC 597."
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 289 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Sec.& Curator Victoria Memorial Hall vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity & Ors on 9 March, 2010

It would normally be wise and safe for the courts to leave such decisions to experts who are more familiar with the problems they face than the courts generally can be. This view has consistently been reiterated by this Court in Km. Neelima Misra v. Dr. Harinder Kaur Paintal & Ors., AIR 1990 SC 1402; The Secretary & Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall v. Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity & Ors., AIR 2010 SC 1285; Dr. Basavaiah v. Dr. H.L. Ramesh & Ors., (2010) 8 SCC 372; and State of H.P. & Ors. v. H.P. Nizi Vyavsayik Prishikshan Kendra Sangh, (2011) 6 SCC 597."
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 308 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Basavaiah vs H.L. Ramesh & Ors on 29 July, 2010

It would normally be wise and safe for the courts to leave such decisions to experts who are more familiar with the problems they face than the courts generally can be. This view has consistently been reiterated by this Court in Km. Neelima Misra v. Dr. Harinder Kaur Paintal & Ors., AIR 1990 SC 1402; The Secretary & Curator, Victoria Memorial Hall v. Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity & Ors., AIR 2010 SC 1285; Dr. Basavaiah v. Dr. H.L. Ramesh & Ors., (2010) 8 SCC 372; and State of H.P. & Ors. v. H.P. Nizi Vyavsayik Prishikshan Kendra Sangh, (2011) 6 SCC 597."
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 316 - D Bhandari - Full Document

State Of H.P.& Ors vs H.P.Nizi Vyavsayik Prishikshan ... on 20 April, 2011

19. Having carefully considered the scheme of the syllabus for the practical examination of the Degree Course, as laid down in the ordinance, I find that the scheme for the practical examination, did not lay down any specific criteria/manner in which the marks had to be divided and, therefore, in my considered opinion there was no obligation on the examiners to award the marks in a particular manner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 138 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1