Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.35 seconds)Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
T. Vengama Naidu vs T. Dora Swamy Naidu & Ors on 27 February, 2007
33. Before closing, we must refer to the judgment of the
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 14:37:53 :::
AJN
44
Supreme Court in T. T. Vengama Naidu's case. The
appellant therein had filed a private complaint against the
respondents which was sent for investigation under
Section 156(3) of the Code. Criminal case was registered
under Sections 464, 423, 420 read with Section 34 of the
IPC. Investigation was in progress. On a petition filed
under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court quashed
the complaint.
Trisuns Chemical Industry vs Rajesh Agarwal And Others C on 17 September, 1999
company and the complainant-company and Narsingh
Dass had no authority to settle the dispute. Learned
counsel relied on the judgments of the Supreme Court in
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors. (1993) 3
SCC 259, Trisuns Chemical Industry v. Rajesh
Agarwal & Ors. (1999) 8 SCC 686 and an unreported
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 14:37:53 :::
AJN
16
judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab
v. Pritam Chand & Ors. in Criminal Appeal No.1069
of 2004 dated 11/2/2009 and submitted that the
petition deserves to be dismissed.
State Of Punjab vs Pritam Chand & Ors on 11 February, 2009
company and the complainant-company and Narsingh
Dass had no authority to settle the dispute. Learned
counsel relied on the judgments of the Supreme Court in
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors. (1993) 3
SCC 259, Trisuns Chemical Industry v. Rajesh
Agarwal & Ors. (1999) 8 SCC 686 and an unreported
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 14:37:53 :::
AJN
16
judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab
v. Pritam Chand & Ors. in Criminal Appeal No.1069
of 2004 dated 11/2/2009 and submitted that the
petition deserves to be dismissed.