Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.17 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Ravi Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 4 March, 2005
2006 (1) RCR Crl. Page 43 titled Ravi Kumar Vs. State, wherein our
own High Court interalia observed that where girl aged 16 years and 8
months went with her lover of her own accord and married the lover boy,
marriage is neither void nor illegal notwithstanding the fact that the girl
was below 18 year but she had reached the age of discretion; 2001 (1)
RCR (Crl.)
Shamsher Alam Alias Sheru And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 15 April, 2002
Page 17 titled Shamsher Alam @ Sheru
and Anr. Vs. State of U.P & Ors. by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court
and of our own High Court reported in 2006 (1) RCR Crl.
Manish Singh vs State Govt Of Nct And Ors. on 7 December, 2005
In view of the facts & circumstances & authorities referred above,
there is no other inference deducible except the one that prosecutrix left
with accused voluntarily and also had voluntarily sexual act with him.
Kasan vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 January, 2002
18. From the above it is discernible that version given to doctor
just after apprehension, also does not say in what manner she was enticed
by the accused. She has even changed the facts of the case there. In 2002
(2) RCR Crl. page 649 titled Kasan Vs. State of Rajasthan, wherein in
a case U/s.363/366/376 IPC accused persons were acquitted on the
grounds inter-alia that there was no evidence on record to show that
prosecutrix was actually taken away against her will and subjected to rape;
Suresh Babu vs State Of Kerala on 3 November, 2000
page 279 titled Suresh Babu Vs. State of Kerala by
Hon'ble Kerala High Court, on the similar facts where in a case U/s.
363/376 IPC prosecutrix aged about 16 years left the house of her own
accord and got an agreement of marriage registered with Sub-Registrar
and lived with accused as his wife, Hon'ble High Court held that no
offence Us. 363/376 IPC is disclosed. Another authority relied on is
reported in 2002 (4) RCR Crl.
1