Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Section 3 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Rakesh Wadhawan & Ors vs M/S. Jagdamba Industrial Corporation & ... on 26 April, 2002
14. It may further be observed that an attempt was made to argue that on account of law laid down in Rakesh Wadhan and Ors. v. Jagdatnba Industrial Corporation and Ors., (2002-2)131 P.L.R. 370, the tenant-respondent is entitled to an opportunity for payment of rent. It was suggested that since no provisional order of assessment of rent has been drawn by the Rent Controller, the tenant-respondent deserved to be granted an opportunity for depositing the arrears of rent. However, I am not impressed with the argument raised because this Court has taken a consistent view that in cases where the tenant disputed the relationship between the parties, then no order of assessment of rent is required to be framed because it would be a futile exercise because the tenant cannot be expected to pay rent to some one to whom he did not regard his landlord.
Hukama Devi And Ors. vs Bhagwan Dass on 11 February, 2003
The aforementioned view has been taken by this Court in the case of Ramanand Shastri v. Gain Singhfi, 2003(3) Civil Court Cases 62 and Hukma Devi v. Bhagwan Doss, (2003-2)134 P.L.R. 771. Therefore, I have no hesitation in disagreeing with the suggestion made.
Section 2 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
The Wakf Act, 1995
1