Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)
Chint Kaur And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 15 May, 2015 cites

Israr vs State Of U.P on 6 December, 2004

It has been authoritatively held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Israr v. State of U.P., 2005(2) RCR(Criminal) 40 that maxim "falsus in uno falsus in omnibus" has no applicability in India. Even if evidence has been found to be deficient to prove the guilt of other persons in case but the residue is found OMKAR SINGH 2015.05.20 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRA-S No.560-SB of 1996 [13] sufficient to prove the guilt of an accused notwithstanding the fact of acquittal of number of other co-accused, his conviction can be maintained. It was observed that even where evidence of some of the witnesses is found to be deficient to prove the guilt of some accused, it is open to the court to convict co-accused on the same evidence. Evidence on record is found trustworthy and reliable and clearly points to no other hypothesis but the guilt of appellant - Harbans Singh.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 87 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Gurnaib Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab on 15 November, 2011

At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant raised an alternate OMKAR SINGH 2015.05.20 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRA-S No.560-SB of 1996 [14] plea that at best the appellant can be held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 306 IPC and sentence imposed upon him be reduced to that of already undergone. He relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gurnaib Singh v. State of Punjab, 2013 (7) SCC 108 and a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Krishan Kumar and others v. State of Haryana, 2006(3) RCR (Crl.) 7.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 34 - L N Mittal - Full Document
1   2 Next