Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)
Md. Muquaddar vs The State Of Bihar on 2 September, 2025 cites

Hira Singh And Another vs Union Of India And Another on 23 August, 2018

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the said recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no any valid authorization for keeping the same. Learned counsel has further placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Hira Singh and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Anr, (2020)20 Supreme Court Cases 272 of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49732 of 2025(4) dt.02-09-2025 3/4 Hon'ble Apex Court has held that "weight of entire materials/ mixture along with neutral material is to be considered for ascertainment of whether the quantity is "small quantity" or "commercial quantity". The act of the petitioner amounts to clear violation of section 8 of the N.D.P.S. Act as it clearly prohibits possession of narcotic substance except medical and scientific purposes.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 161 - Full Document

Narcotics Control Bureau vs Mohit Agarwal on 19 July, 2022

7. If either of these two conditions is not satisfied, the bar operates and the accused cannot be released on bail. The Court is of the opinion that the parameters of bail available under Section 37 of the Act have not satisfied in the facts of the instant case. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mohit Aggarwal 2022 SCC OnLine SC 891 has held that "The length of the period of his custody or the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed and the trial has commenced are by themselves not considerations that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49732 of 2025(4) dt.02-09-2025 4/4 can be treated as persuasive grounds for granting relief to the respondent under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act."
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 369 - H Kohli - Full Document
1