Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.30 seconds)P.D. Gupta vs Ram Murti & Anr on 8 July, 1997
16 wp4712.09
24] Reliance is placed on the judgment of the
Supreme Court in the case of P.D.Gupta vs Ram
Murti,reported in 1997 (7) SCC 147, in which it is held
thus :-
Jamilabai Abdul Kadar vs Shankerlal Gulabchand & Ors on 30 April, 1975
46] If the facts of the case in hand are examined
in the light of the observations of the Supreme Court
reproduced herein above in the case of Jamilabai
(supra), the withdrawal of the suit by respondent
no.1 does not appear to be in good faith and for
the benefit of the petitioner, rather it appears
that such withdrawal appears to be without
instructions of the petitioner, so as to advance
advantage/benefit to respondent nos. 4 and 5, who
are the son and wife of respondent no.1.
State Of Rajasthan & Ors vs Basant Nahata on 7 September, 2005
In
(State of Rajasthan Vs. Basant Nehata)
5, 2005 DGLS (soft)1110:2005(12)SCC
77, this Court held :-
Sri Dadu Dayal Mahasabha vs Sukhdev Arya And Another on 17 November, 1989
49] The Supreme Court in the case of Dadu Dayal
Mahasabha vs Sukhdev Arya and another, reported in
1990 (1) Mah.L.R. 935 held that, if the order
permitting withdrawal of the suit is passed under
Section
application
151
for
of the
recalling
Civil
the
Procedure
said order
Code,
under
Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code is
maintainable.
Section 151 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 2 in The Powers-Of-Attorney Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Goodyear India Ltd. Etc. Etc vs State Of Haryana & Anr. Etc. Etc on 19 October, 1989
Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and another, reported in
2012 (1) Bom.C.R. 293 and submits that the Supreme
Court in the said judgment in para 13 has discussed the
scope of power of attorney. The Supreme Court observed
that the power of attorney is not an instrument of
transfer in regard to any right,title or interest in an
immovable property. Therefore, according to the
counsel appearing for the petitioner, the alleged power
of attorney in favour of respondent no.4 by the
petitioner cannot be a document for transfer of any
right, title or interest in any immovable property.
The Powers-Of-Attorney Act, 1882
1