Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)
State vs . Manoj Kumar on 10 March, 2008 cites

State Of Haryana vs Manoj Kumar on 2 November, 1993

5. On careful perusal and analysis of the entire evidence on record I find that no corroborative, consistent, reliable and sufficient evidence to make up the edifice of the prosecution case has been produced by the prosecution. Moreover the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses do not inspire confidence. Prosecution has produced and examined only three witnesses out of six witnesses listed in the list of State Vs. Manoj Kumar 4 FIR No.: 16/06 witnesses. No plausible explanation has been placed by the prosecution for such non-production and non-examination of the remaining witnesses. IO HC Banne Singh of the case has neither been produced nor examined by the prosecution. Non- examination of IO causes prejudice to the accused and it is a serious omission. In my this view I am fortified by case 1998 (1) Crime 709 wherein it was held that "non- examination of IO in a criminal trial causes serious lacuna in prosecution case and prejudice to accused. The tendency of IO's to keep away from the court is not good,"
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 35 - N P Singh - Full Document

Ahammed Hasim Jawad vs State Bank Of Travancore on 25 June, 2007

In case Mohd. Hasim Vs. State 1999 VI AD (Delhi) 569 (Hon'ble) Mr. Justice M.S.A Siddiqui). It was observed that documents prepared before registering the FIR bears FIR numbers, meaning thereby, either FIR was recorded posterior in time or that documents were prepared after the recording of FIR, and was hold that in both case, prosecution case would collapse.
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 73 - T B Radhakrishnan - Full Document

Mohd. Shamim vs The State on 4 October, 1989

6. The accused has no way to prove his innocence or to show that false case has been foisted on him except by pointing out vital discrepancies in the police evidence. Hon'ble Sh. P.K. Bahri, J in the case of Mohd. Shamim Vs. State 1991 Drugs cases Page-82, observed that material aspects of the case are how the secret information was received and raiding party was formed, what efforts were made to join the public witnesses and in what manner proceedings were carried out at the spot.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 122 - Full Document
1