Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.32 seconds)Section 33 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
The U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknowthrough Its ... vs M/S. Kalra Properties (P) Ltd.,Lucknow ... on 17 January, 1996
(iii) U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow Vs. Kalra properties Pvt. Ltd. AIR
1996 SC 1170 again on the principles of market value of land
acquisition cases;
Duncans Industries Ltd vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 December, 1999
(v) Duncans Industries Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. AIR 2000 SC 355
on the scope of judicial interference in the stamp duty
determined by the authorities under the Stamp Act;
R. Rajalakshmi And Ors. vs The Revenue Divisional Officer And Anr. on 15 April, 1988
(vi) R. Rajalakshmi Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer AIR 1989
Madras 96 laying down that no presumption can be drawn in
the matter of valuation;
Kaka Singh vs The Additional Collector And District ... on 29 August, 1985
(vii) Kaka Singh Vs. The Additional Collector AIR 1986 Allahabad
107 also laying down that the Collector in exercise of power
under Section 47-A is not to levy any penalty;
V.N. Devadoss vs Chief Rev. Control Officer-Cum-Ins.& ... on 8 May, 2009
Ponnavolu Sasidar vs Sub-Registrar Hayatnagar, And Others on 9 October, 1991
(iv) Ponnavolu Sasidar Vs. Sub-Registrar, Hayatnagar AIR 1992
W.P.(C) No.13122/2009 & W.P.(C) No.13888/2009 Page 17 of 24
Andhra Pradesh 198 relating to the local statute and having no
application here.
Abhinav Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 7 November, 2003
(v) Abhinav Kumar Vs. State of Haryana 2001 (1) Punjab Law
Reporter 598 holding that reference under Section 47-A can be
made immediately after registration of the document and not
thereafter. However the present is not a case of reference but of
the Collector of Stamps taking up the matter on a complaint.