Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)A. Ayyasamy vs A. Paramasivam & Ors on 4 October, 2016
"43. Hence, the allegations of criminal wrongdoing or of statutory
violation would not detract from the jurisdiction of the Arbitral
Tribunal to resolve a dispute arising out of a civil or contractual
relationship on the basis of the jurisdiction conferred by the
arbitration agreement." (A. Ayyasamy case [A. Ayyasamy v. A.
Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386 : (2017) 1 SCC (Civ) 79] , SCC
p. 414, para 43)"
Section 8 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Vidya Drolia vs Durga Trading Corporation on 14 December, 2020
In Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn. , (2021) 2 SCC 1 , it was
held as under :-
M/S Sundaram Finance Limited And Anr vs T. Thankam on 20 February, 2015
[Ed. : As observed in Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. T. Thankam ,
(2015) 14 SCC 444, at p. 449, para 13.] "
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Avitel Post Studioz Limited And Ors. vs Hsbc Pi Holding (Mauritius) Limited on 19 August, 2020
In Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. v. HSBC PI
Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd. 2021 (4) SCC 713, it was clarified that
commercial frauds between private parties remain arbitrable, and only
frauds affecting public funds or involving elements of public law are not.
Section 21 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
1