Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.27 seconds)Section 63 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 67 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 68 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Mathew Oommen vs Suseela Mathew on 3 January, 2006
In the judgment relied upon by the
appellant's counsel in the case of MATHEW OOMMEN
vs. SUSEELA MATHEW reported in AIR 2006 SC
786, wherein it is held that there is no dispute
regarding the principles enumerated in the above said
decision that there was no requirement that scribe
27
cannot be an attesting witness. But, in the instant
case, admittedly, scribe is not examined and PW2 is
not a scribe and he has not seen the execution of the
Will by Kempaiah. Hence, that judgment is not
applicable to the facts of this case.