Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)Jaswantsingh Pratapsingh Jadeja vs Rajkot Municipal Corporation & Anr on 11 October, 2007
If the satisfaction of the employer rested on the
unsatisfactory performance on the part of the
appellant, the matter might have been different, but
in that case, from the impugned order it is evident
that it was not the unsatisfactory nature and
character of his performance only which was taken
into consideration but series of his acts as well,
misconduct on his part had also been taken into
consideration therefor.
Abhujit Gupta vs S.N. B. National Centre, Basic Sciences ... on 18 April, 2006
It is one thing to say that he
was found unsuitable for a job but it is another
thing to say that he was said to have committed
some misconduct.
As in the instant case, it now stands admitted that the services of the
respondent had been terminated on a finding of misconduct, the said
decision of this Court in Abhijit Gupta (supra) has no application.
Jai Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 August, 2006
15. Reliance has also been placed on Jai Singh Vs. Union of India and
Others [(2006) 9 SCC 717]. In that case, the appellants conduct was shown
in the records as Unsatisfactory.
Dhananjay vs Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad ... on 30 January, 2003
9 . The question whether the termination of service
is simpliciter or punitive has been examined in several
cases e.g. Dhananjay v. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla
Parishad and Mathew P. Thomas v. Kerala State Civil
Supply Corpn. Ltd. An order of termination
simpliciter passed during the period of probation has
been generating undying debate.
Mathew P. Thomas vs Kerala State Civil Supply Corpn. Ltd. & ... on 19 February, 2003
9 . The question whether the termination of service
is simpliciter or punitive has been examined in several
cases e.g. Dhananjay v. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla
Parishad and Mathew P. Thomas v. Kerala State Civil
Supply Corpn. Ltd. An order of termination
simpliciter passed during the period of probation has
been generating undying debate.
Dipti Prakash Banerjee vs Satvendra Nath Bose National Centre For ... on 10 February, 1999
In Dipti Prakash Banerjee Vs. Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre
for Basic Sciences, Calcutta and Others [(1999) 3 SCC 60], this Court held
that the material which amounts to stigma need not be contained only in the
termination order, but may also be contained in an Order or proceeding
referred to in the order of termination or annexure thereto.
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1