Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.48 seconds)

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... vs Bhikhari Yadav & Ors. on 3 January, 2012

70. Furthermore, as held in the case of Bajaj Allianze General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bhikhari Yadav, MAC APP. No. 727/11, dated 03.01.12 the defence of absence of any permit is to be proved by the Insurance Company by summoning a witness from the Registration Authority. The Hon'ble High Court with regard to permit has held as under:­ "Turning to the second limb of argument i.e. issuance of permit to ply vehicle no. DL­1G­2715 on the date of the accident, the appellant insurance company did not summon any record from the relevant office of the Delhi Transport MACT No. 272/12 Sh. Amar Singh & Anr. v. Sh. Dinesh Pal Singh & Ors. Page 15 of 20 MACT No. 287/12 Smt. Tulsi Roy & Ors. v. Sh. Dinesh Pal Singh & Ors. Page 15 of 20 Authority to show that on the date of the accident, the vehicle did not have any permit to ply on the road. Here again, the insurance company failed to discharge the onus that there was breach of the condition of policy in this regard".
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 35 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Regional Manager Oriental Insurance Co ... vs B S Kalegowda S/O B K Subbegowda on 14 June, 2012

67. In the written statement, insurance company has not MACT No. 272/12 Sh. Amar Singh & Anr. v. Sh. Dinesh Pal Singh & Ors. Page 14 of 20 MACT No. 287/12 Smt. Tulsi Roy & Ors. v. Sh. Dinesh Pal Singh & Ors. Page 14 of 20 taken a definite defence that the vehicle had no permit. The defence is only that if the vehicle was being plied without permit, then insurance company will have no liability. Such a pleading is not a pleading of a defence that there was no permit at the time of accident (See Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. B.S. Bhargava, a judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in MAC APP. No. 127/10 dated 14.08.12).
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1