Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (3.53 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
P. Chidambaram vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 5 September, 2019
submitting thus that though the verdict in P. Chidambram V.
Directorate of Enforcement (supra) relates to the aspect of grant or
non grant of an anticipatory bail, the factum that appropriate
investigation can be conducted by way of collection of more
information in relation to recovery of relevant information where an
accused is in custody and specially when the accused is in police
custody.
Section 8 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 7A in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Central Bureau Of Investigation, ... vs Anupam J. Kulkarni on 8 May, 1992
8. The other aspect that has essentially to be observed is that the
accused persons, i.e., respondent Nos. 1,2, 3 and 5 were produced on
21.6.2022 before the Special Judge, PC Act (CBI-08), PC Act, RADC,
New Delhi, and in terms of the verdict of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court
in CBI V. Anupam J. Kulkarni; (supra) as observed in paragraph 4
thereof to the effect: