Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)

M/S. Sbi Capital Markets Ltd., vs The Acit Rg-4(3)(3), on 13 January, 2023

3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a nationalized public sector bank, which is assessed to TDS having TAN CHES02510E for the AY 16-17(FY 2015-16). The case of the assessee was selected for e- verification regarding LTC payments made to assessee's employees. In accordance with the same, the assessee was directed to provide details of LTC payments [foreign travel] and reasons for non deduction of TDS under section 192B of the Act. The reply of the assessee and details are reproduced in page 2 & 3 of the penalty order. According to the Assessing Officer, as it was observed from the reply, that one of the employees of the assessee claimed LFC (leave fare concession) amounting to ₹.1,85,452/- involving travel places outside India. The Assessing Officer observed that the exemption under section 10(5) of the Act is not available as the place of travelling of the said employee is not situated in India. The Assessing Officer further observed that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SBI v. ACIT in Civil Appeal No. 8181 of 2022) dated 04.11.2022 confirmed the view of the Assessing Officer's stand therein, treating the employer i.e., the assessee in default for non deducting tax source while realizing payments to its employee as leave fare concession on foreign travel. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer determined non deduction of tax at source under section 201 of the Act and interest under section 201(1A) of the Act at ₹.55,645/- and ₹.53,420/- 3 I.T.A. No.1465/Chny/24 respectively vide his order dated 31.03.2023 passed under section 201/201(1A) of the Act. However, the Assessing Officer suspended recovery proceeding till final disposal of W.A. No. 1653 of 2023 pending on the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 45 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1