Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.42 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Y.V. Rangaiah And Ors. vs J. Sreenivasa Rao And Ors. on 24 March, 1983
19. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents (who has submitted a written brief also) argued that while inviting the applications from the departmental candidates for the post of AEO (MMS) on 30.10.2000, it had been made quite clear that the post of AEO was a tenure post for a period of three years, and that the incumbent can go back to his parent post after expiry of three years, or upon reaching the age of 57 years, whichever is earlier. It was also reiterated that it has all through been in the applicants knowledge that he was retaining his lien in the parent cadre post of TGT, and had the applicant not been promoted to the post of PGT on 16.11.2009, even in that case, he would have been reverted to the parent cadre of TGT on attaining the age of 57 years. It was further argued that it is settled law that a tenure post cannot be a feeder cadre for any promotional post, and it was only because of this reason that the applicant had, with all his satisfaction, accepted his promotion to the post of PGT on 16.11.2009, for which post the feeder cadre is TGT only. It was, therefore, reiterated that the reply issued by the respondents is correct, and the applicants case can only be considered for the post of Vice Principal in his own turn, on the basis of his seniority in the feeder cadre of PGT w.e.f. 16.11.2009, and that no TGT junior to the applicant has so far been considered for promotion as Vice Principal. Accordingly, it was reiterated that the OA deserves to be dismissed.
1