Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37 (0.29 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 473 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sarah Mathew vs Inst., Cardio Vascular Diseases & Ors on 26 November, 2013
(iii) 2014 (2) SCC 62 (Sarah Mathew Vs. Institute of Cardio Vascular
Diseases):
Section 239 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Bharat Damodar Kale & Anr vs State Of A.P on 8 October, 2003
51. In view of the above, we hold that for the
purpose of computing the period of limitation under Section
468 CrPC the relevant date is the date of filing of the
complaint or the date of institution of prosecution and not
the date on which the Magistrate takes cognizance. We
further hold that Bharat Kale [Bharat Damodar
Kale v. State of A.P., (2003) 8 SCC 559 : 2004 SCC (Cri)
39] which is followed in Japani Sahoo [Japani
Sahoo v. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty, (2007) 7 SCC 394 :
Japani Sahoo vs Chandra Sekhar Mohanty on 27 July, 2007
51. In view of the above, we hold that for the
purpose of computing the period of limitation under Section
468 CrPC the relevant date is the date of filing of the
complaint or the date of institution of prosecution and not
the date on which the Magistrate takes cognizance. We
further hold that Bharat Kale [Bharat Damodar
Kale v. State of A.P., (2003) 8 SCC 559 : 2004 SCC (Cri)
39] which is followed in Japani Sahoo [Japani
Sahoo v. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty, (2007) 7 SCC 394 :