Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)The Apprentices Act, 1961
The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948
Section 78 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 75 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
The Regional Provident Fund ... vs The Management Of Precise Wire Cloth Co. ... on 12 April, 1990
9. Reference was also made to a judgment in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. P.W.C. Co. (P)Ltd., 1992 (1) LW 288. In that case, while interpreting Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, it was held that after the amendment to the said provisions with effect from August 1, 1988, by virtue of the amendment, the definition of an "employee" would include any person who was engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice under the Apprentices Act, 1961, or under the Standing Orders of establishment.
The Poly Clinic, Nagercoil vs Regional Commissioner, Employees ... on 24 September, 1981
In Poly Clinic v. Regional Commissioner, Employees' Provident Fund, 1983-I-LLJ-449 (Mad) a learned single judge of this Court following the judgment of the Supreme Court in ESI Corporation v. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. (supra) held that apprentices are not employees as defined under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
1