State vs Naved Ur Rehman on 21 March, 2016
Shaista
Nusrat were arrested from ISBT vide their arrest memo Ex. PW-
1/E , PW-1/F & PW-1/G. During cross-examination she stated
that she do not remember the date and time of arrest, but
State Vs. Habib Ur Rehman CC No. 291138/16 4 of 54
stated that accused were arrested from hall of ISBT. She stated
that no writing work was done in her presence at ISBT, but
denied the suggestion that accused were not arrested from
ISBT at her instance. She also denied that on 25.02.2005 while
accused were present in Tis Hazari Court for appearing in the
Court of Ld. District & Sessions Judge, they were apprehended
by the police. She stated that she got the pamphlet from her
younger son as the same was being distributed in the market.
She also stated that pamphlets for having schemes Rs. 10 per
day, weekly, some FDR for five years. She stated that she
visited the office for the first time with her husband and
accused Mujeeb Ur Rehman and Rahat Afzal were present and
Shaista Nursrat came there with key. She denied suggestion
that whatever she has deposed against accused Habib UR
Rehman is false at the instance of Nasir . She denied that Habib
Ur Rehman was not present in the office and had not met him
for any scheme and he was present in his clinic at Nagina, U.P.
on that day. She stated that the complaint is type written at
the PS by the SHO who read over the same to her. She denied
that her complaint is not proved. She stated that in the year
2003 she found the premises locked and sealed. She denied
that she has not made any demand to recover her money from
the accused persons or the company.