Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.59 seconds)Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd vs Beant Kaur And Ors on 14 March, 2019
That being so, once the judgment in Shri Ram General
Insurance (Supra) has been differentiated by the Coordinate Bench of this
Court in Meena Devi (supra) by placing reliance upon the judgement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, no benefit of the judgment in Beant Kaur
(supra) can be extended in favour of the appellant.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Reena Devi & Ors on 20 February, 2013
Keeping in view the fact that a Coordinate Bench of this Court
has allowed the benefit of assessment of income on the basis of minimum
wages fixed by the Deputy Commissioner as valid action in Meena Devi
(supra), no grievance can be made by the appellant that only wages as per
the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 should have been taken into account to
assess the income of the victim and the said argument cannot be accepted
and the the same is accordingly rejected.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020
Hence, the claimants in the said case are held
entitled for consortium @ Rs.40,000/- each as spouse consortium, parental
7 of 8
::: Downloaded on - 27-05-2023 02:04:22 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:006085
FAO-5294-2016 (O&M) -8-
consortium as well as children consortium as per law settled by Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in Satinder Kaur (supra).
Section 3 in The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
1