Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)

Ram Niwas Gupta vs Mumtaz Hasan And Ors. on 16 January, 2002

4. The sole argument raised by the learned Counsel for the appellant is that the suit for specific performance has been filed after two years of the date fixed for the execution of the sale. Therefore, the plaintiff are not entitled to decree for specific performance. Reliance is placed on K.S. Vidyanadam and Ors. v. Vairavan ; Ram Niwas Gupta v. Mumtaz Hasan and Ors. 2002(1) P.L.J. 175 and Smt. Ralli and Ors. v. Smt. Satinderjit Kaur (1998-1) 118 P.L.R. 666.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Smt. Ralli And Ors. vs Smt. Satinderjit Kaur on 29 September, 1997

4. The sole argument raised by the learned Counsel for the appellant is that the suit for specific performance has been filed after two years of the date fixed for the execution of the sale. Therefore, the plaintiff are not entitled to decree for specific performance. Reliance is placed on K.S. Vidyanadam and Ors. v. Vairavan ; Ram Niwas Gupta v. Mumtaz Hasan and Ors. 2002(1) P.L.J. 175 and Smt. Ralli and Ors. v. Smt. Satinderjit Kaur (1998-1) 118 P.L.R. 666.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1