Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gajanan Narayan Patil And Others Vs. ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 February, 1990
In support of his contention learned Counsel has relied upon Gajanan v. State of Maharashtra 1997 S.C.C. (Crl.) 605. The contention is meritless. It cannot be over-looked that the deceased had four gun shot injuries on his person. Statement of PW. 1 Dr. Narinder Singh suggests that there were four entry wounds and four exit wounds and in this situation the entire body would be smeared with blood and the possibility that PW. 1 Dr. Narinder Singh could not trace any dragging marks on the body of the deceased, cannot be ruled out.
Section 34 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Kaki Ramesh vs State Of A.P on 29 April, 1994
Similar circumstance was before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case Kaki Ramesh and Ors. v. State of A.P. 2 1994 S.C.C. (Crl.) 1214 wherein it was held that it is immaterial and the Supreme Court advert in the following words:
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1