Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.40 seconds)
Keshav Singh Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 May, 2019 cites

C.B.I vs V.Vijay Sai Reddy on 9 May, 2013

In CBI v. V. Vijay Sai Reddy, the Court had reiterated the principle by observing thus: (SCC p. 465, para 34) "34. While granting bail, the court has to keep in mind the nature of accusation, the nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused, reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the trial, reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with, the larger interests of the public/State and other similar considerations. It has also to be kept in mind that 4 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.19938/2019 for the purpose of granting bail, the legislature has used the words "reasonable grounds for believing" instead of "the evidence" which means the court dealing with the grant of bail can only satisfy itself as to whether there is a genuine case against the accused and that the prosecution will be able to produce prima facie evidence in support of the charge. It is not expected, at this stage, to have the evidence establishing the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt."
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 178 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Dinesh M.N. (S.P.) vs State Of Gujarat on 28 April, 2008

In this context what has been stated by a three-Judge Bench in Dinesh M.N. v. State of Gujarat is quite instructive. In the said case, the Court has held that where the Court admits the accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 32 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next