Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.29 seconds)Section 447 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Prevention Of Damage To Public Property Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
The Railways Act, 1989
Section 145 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Bhushan Kumar & Anr vs State(Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 4 April, 2012
(21). Similarly in the case of Bhushan Kumar vs. State (NCT of Delhi), 2012 5 SCC 424, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that Section 204 of the Code does not mandate the Magistrate to explicitly state the reasons for issuance of summons. It clearly states that if in the opinion of a Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence, there is sufficient ground for proceeding, then the summons may be issued.
Sunil Bharti Mittal vs Cbi on 9 January, 2015
While explaining the true import of expression "sufficient ground for proceeding" the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sunil Bharti Mittal vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, AIR 2015 sc 923 has held as under :