Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.49 seconds)

B.V. Rangam vs B. Govinda Reddy And Anr. on 1 April, 2004

22. Counsel for complainant has further submitted relying upon the judgment cited as B.V. Rangam Vs. B. Govinda Reddy & Anr. 2004 CRI. L.J 3170 that since issuance of cheque is admitted, presumptions U/s. 139 & 118 NI Act can be drawn in favour of complainant. Presumption U/s. 139 can be drawn that complainant has discharged his initial burden as to legally enforceable debt. Now the burden to prove that said cheque was not issued against a legally enforceable debt is with accused and if the accused fails to rebut those presumption, he is liable to be prosecuted U/s. 138 NI Act.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 9 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1