Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)Rajaram Prasad Yadav vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 July, 2013
5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through
the records. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajaram Prasad Yadav Vs.
State of Bihar & another (supra) has noted that "the exercise of power under
Section 311 Cr.P.C. should be resorted to only with the object of finding out
the truth or obtaining proper proof of such facts, which lead to a just and
correct decision of the case." It is further held that, " the exercise of the said
power cannot be dubbed as "filling in a lacuna in the prosecution case",
unless the facts and circumstances of the case make it apparent that the
exercise of power by the court would result in causing serious prejudice to
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: AMITABH
RANJAN
Signing time: 14-10-2025
18:59:28
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:52013
4 MCRC-17682-2024
the accused, resulting in miscarriage of justice." It is further held that " the
wide discretionary power under Section 311 Cr.P.C. should be exercised
judiciously and not arbitrarily".
Satbir Singh vs The State Of Haryana on 28 May, 2021
In
the case of Satbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana (supra) , the Hon'ble Supreme
Court has noted as under:
Nur Nehar Begum @ Nur Nehar And 8 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 16 September, 2019
In the case of Neha Begum & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & another
[Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.(s)3910 of 2024] decided on 02.09.2024 ,
the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under:
1