Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.33 seconds)Section 507 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
N.P. Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 20 April, 2007
46. Counsel for petitioner further contended and elaborated how
urbanization has taken place in Delhi since 1957. He further highlighted
the Dwarka Phase I project which took off in the year 1990, the effect of
notification dated 24.10.1994 u/s 507 of DMC Act, change of land use
from rural/agricultural to residential/commercial on 16.10.2000 and
acquisition as per Master Plan for Dwarka phase-II created the potentiality
of the land which can be used in future for residential, commercial and
industrial purposes. He relied on various advertisements and notifications
including assembly of land for colonization or development Exb. P-1/32.
Counsel for Petitioner contended that the acquired land has potential
after change of land use and preparation of Master Plan especially Zonal
Master Plan of 2001. The determination of the market value of the land
has great potentiality and while determining the market value, the Court
may consider the potentiality of the land and also apply some guess work
for future land use after acquisition. Counsel for petitioner relied upon the
judgments Harichand Vs. UOI DLT 2001 (91) 602, Anil Kumar
Sharma Vs. UOI DLT 2000 (86) 825, P.N. Singh Vs. UOI 1997 I AD
(Delhi) 83 and Trikha Ram Vs. Sahib Ram DLT 1997 (69) 749.
Satpal & Ors vs Union Of India on 24 September, 1997
In the case of Satpal & Ors. Vs. Union of India (1997) 11
Supreme Court Cases 423, Supreme Court held that
"if there is no explanation whatsoever for such a sharp
increase in price of land in such a short time.