Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.37 seconds)Section 8 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 61 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 62 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 64 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. vs Delhi Electricity Regulatory ... on 18 October, 2022
basis of which ARR was determined, the stage of
truing up being one only for adjustment of actuals
qua the estimated amounts and not meant for
introducing new or varied methodology. We may
quote Hon'ble Supreme Court on this subject in the
judgment reported in the case of BSES Rajdhani
Power Limited vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory
Commission (2022 SCC OnLine SC 1450) as
under:
Section 63 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Omar Usman Chamadia vs Abdul & Anr on 4 February, 2004
133. An order that affects the financial rights of a regulated entity without
assigning reasons, becomes a non-speaking order. The law on the
requirement of reasoned orders from quasi-judicial bodies is settled
beyond any doubt. As the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in Omar Usman
Chamadia v. Abdul [(2004) 13 SCC 234], a reasoned order is a
requirement of law that must be complied with in all appealable orders.
The purpose of reasoned orders is to demonstrate application of mind,
minimize arbitrariness, and enable an effective appeal.
Chairman, D.A.,Rani Lakshmi Bai ... vs Jagdish Sharan Varshney And Ors on 26 March, 2009
The Hon'ble
Supreme Court further in Chairman, Disciplinary Authority, Rani Laxmi
Bai Kshetriya Gramin Bank v. Jagdish Sharan Varshney [(2009) 4 SCC
240] held that a quasi-judicial order that does not disclose reasons does
not demonstrate application of mind and is liable to be set aside.