Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.62 seconds)

Ritesh Sinha vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 7 December, 2012

9. With regard to above, it is relevant to mention here that the similar issue has been dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of 'Ritesh Sinha Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.' AIR 2019, Supreme Court 3592. In the above mentioned case the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India observed (before the enactment of BNSS) that until explicit provisions are engrafted in the Code of Criminal Procedure by Parliament, a Judicial Magistrate must be conceded the power to order a person to give a sample of his voice for the purpose of investigation of a crime. Such power has to be conferred on a Magistrate by a process of judicial interpretation and in exercise of jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. We order accordingly and consequently dispose the appeals in terms of the above.
Supreme Court of India Cites 57 - Cited by 122 - Full Document
1