Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)
Smt. Smriti Das vs The State Of Tripura on 20 July, 2020 cites

Niyasha Das vs The State Of Tripura & Others on 24 August, 2018

In the writ petition being WP(C)No.192 of 2018 [Smt. Niyasha Das @ Niyasha Rani Das versus State of Tripura & Others] the petitioner has urged the resembling relief but some ancilliary reliefs are not urged in this writ petition. The petitioner has sought that the memorandum dated 03.03.2017 [Annexure-6 to the writ petition] issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Unakoti DRDA be declared discriminatory, illegal and unconstitutional and therefore, be set aside.
Tripura High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A Rastogi - Full Document

U.O.I. Thr. Govt. Of Pondicherry & Anr vs V. Ramakrishnan & Ors on 7 October, 2005

23. Mr. Das, learned counsel has also placed his reliance on a deicison of the Rajasthan High Court in Dr. I.K. Mansoori versus Union of India and Others reported in (2017) 3 RLW 1969 where the Rajasthan High Court has having relied on V. Ramakrishnan (supra) and thereafter observed that a person who applied for the appointment on deputation has indefeasible right to be treated fairly and equally and once such person is selected and offered with letter of appointment with deputation, the same cannot be cancelled except on the ground of non-suitability and unsatisfactory work. Mr. Das, learned counsel has submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioners in respect of their performance.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 254 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Dr. I.K. Mansoori vs . Union Of India And Others on 5 February, 2016

23. Mr. Das, learned counsel has also placed his reliance on a deicison of the Rajasthan High Court in Dr. I.K. Mansoori versus Union of India and Others reported in (2017) 3 RLW 1969 where the Rajasthan High Court has having relied on V. Ramakrishnan (supra) and thereafter observed that a person who applied for the appointment on deputation has indefeasible right to be treated fairly and equally and once such person is selected and offered with letter of appointment with deputation, the same cannot be cancelled except on the ground of non-suitability and unsatisfactory work. Mr. Das, learned counsel has submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioners in respect of their performance.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 9 - Cited by 15 - M Rafiq - Full Document
1