Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)

Sub-Divisional Inspector Of ... vs Theyyam Joseph Etc on 2 February, 1996

Relying upon these two in Chief Conservator of Forests v. Jagannath Maruti Kondhare [(1996) 2 SCC 293 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 500] and Sub- Divisional Inspector of Post v. Theyyam Joseph [(1996) 8 SCC 489 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 1012] , it was contended by the learned Attorney General that the research work carried on by PRL should be regarded as a sovereign or governmental function.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 54 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Chief Conservator Of Forests And ... vs Jagannath Maruti Kondhare, Etc. Etc. on 6 December, 1995

Relying upon these two in Chief Conservator of Forests v. Jagannath Maruti Kondhare [(1996) 2 SCC 293 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 500] and Sub- Divisional Inspector of Post v. Theyyam Joseph [(1996) 8 SCC 489 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 1012] , it was contended by the learned Attorney General that the research work carried on by PRL should be regarded as a sovereign or governmental function.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 289 - B L Hansaria - Full Document

J.J. Shrimali vs District Development Officer, Mehsana ... on 8 August, 1988

sovereign functions does not really exist 4 it would all depend on the nature of the power and manner of its exercise=. After referring to the three traditional sovereign functions namely legislative power, the administration of laws and the exercise of the judicial power and also the decision of the Gujarat High Court in J.J. Shrimali v. District Development Officer [(1989) 1 Guj LR 396] wherein famine and drought-relief works undertaken by the State Government were held not to be an <industry=, this Court observed that: <What really follows from this judgment is that apart from the aforesaid three functions, there may be some other functions also regarding which a view could be taken that the same too is a sovereign function.=
Gujarat High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 22 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1