Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (6.30 seconds)

Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010

(ii) Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar reported in 2010 (2) TN MAC 581 (SC) DISABILITY  PERMANENT DISABILITY  LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY  Ascertainment  Principles to be followed  Tribunal to first decide whether disability is Permanent Disability? - If it is not Permanent Disability, no question of proceeding further to determine Loss of Earning Capacity  But, if on basis of medical evidence, disability is found to be Permanent Disability, Tribunal has to determine whether such Permanent Disability affected earning capacity  Ascertainment of effect of Permanent Disability on actual earning capacity involves three steps: - Firstly, Tribunal to ascertain what activities Claimant could carry on, in spite of Permanent Disability and what he could not to do as a result of Permanent Disability  Secondly, to ascertain avocation, profession and nature of work before accident and injured / Claimant's age  Thirdly, to find out whether (i) Claimant totally disabled from earning any kind of livelihood or (ii) whether in spite of Permanent Disability Claimant could still effectively carry on activities and functions which he was earlier carrying on, or (iii) Whether he was prevented / restricted from discharging his previous activities and functions, but could carry on some other or lesser scale of activities or functions so as to continue to earn his livelihood  Percentage of Permanent Disability with reference to whole body of a person cannot be assumed to be percentage of Loss of Earning Capacity  Loss of Earning Capacity is something that will have to be assessed by Tribunal with reference to evidence in entirely  Same Permanent Disability may result in different percentage of Loss of Earning Capacity in different persons depending upon nature of profession, occupation or job, age, education and other factors  Illustrated.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3811 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

B.T.Krishnappa vs D.M.,United Insurace Co.Ltd.& Anr on 30 April, 2010

(iii)B.T.Krishnappa v. D.M., United India Insurance Co.Ltd., reported in 2010 ACJ 1971 Quantum  Injury  Leg and head  compound fractures in tibia and fibula bones of right leg and injuries on head and all over body  Injured was hospitalised for 14 days and remained under treatment for 6 months  Injured aged 50, a mason  Doctor opined that injured suffered 48 per cent disablement and he cannot work as mason and do any other manual work  Tribunal accepted 48 per cent disablement but assessed loss of earning capacity at 20 per cent and awarded Rs.1,55,000  High Court accepted Tribunal's assessment of whole body disability at 20 per cent and observed that Tribunal has paid compensation under the heads 'loss of amenities and enjoyment of life and loss of earnings during laid up period' on the lower side  High Court allowed further Rs.34,000 for future medical expenses but did not deal with the aspect of future loss of earnings  Apex Court observed that injured had suffered an irreversible damage to his right leg which will pose difficulties for him in carrying out his avocation as a mason and also drew attention to its views expressed in several judgments about compensation payable to injured persons  Case remanded to the High Court for consideration of the matter afresh for enhancement of compensation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Kaluram Rathore vs Neelam Chand Kirar And Anr. on 22 March, 2004

(i) Kaluram Rathore v. Neelam Chand Kiar & Another reported in 2004(2)TN MAC 16 DISABILITY - Permanent/partial disability - Mere fracture of bones and its re-union will not amount to permanent total disablement or permanent partial disablement, unless doctor examined claimant and assessed percentage of disability after performing scientific tests - without performing scientific tests, bald statement of doctor and certificate inadmissible in evidence - Visual opinion of doctor has no evidentiary value - Claims Tribunal must assign reasons in arriving at conclusion in case of permanent/partial disablement - In absence of evidence regarding scientific tests to determine percentage of disability, Claims Tribunals should take guidance from Schedule of Workmen's Compensation Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1