State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors vs Vinay Kumar Jain on 19 November, 1996
In the present case convict has been convicted for offence
punishable u/s. 3 DPDP Act. No previous conviction has been alleged or
State Vs. Vinay Kr; FIR No.1428-14; PS HN 2/2
proved against convict. The convict is not involved in any such case, as
stated by him. Convict is having a family to support.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and
also the fact that the accused/convict is facing trial for defacing the public
property by putting a poster for advertisement and he is first time
offender. I am of considered view that ends of justice would be met if the
convict is admonished u/s. 3 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958.
Further u/s. 5 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958, convict is
directed to deposit Rs. 1000 / as the cost of the proceedings of the court.
The same has been deposited. Receipt be issued.