cites: 24717149

Registrar. High Court Of Madras Etc vs R. Rajiah And K. Rajeswaran on 11 May, 1988

7.7 In Registrar, High Court of Madras Vs. R. Rajiah [ AIR 1988 SC 1388] Hon'ble Supreme Court held that in the absence of any material to justify the impugned orders of compulsory retirement, those must be held to be illegal and invalid.

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 81 - M M Dutt - Full Document

Baldev Raj Chadha vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 August, 1980

7.5 Hon'ble Supreme Court in Baldev Raj Chadha vs Union of India [(1980) 4 SCC 321] observed that a court/Tribunal is required to satisfy itself whether the compulsory retirement was necessary in public interest.

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 151 - V R Iyer - Full Document

M.S. Bindra vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 September, 1998

7.8 In the case of M.S. Bindra Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. [(1998) 7 SCC 310], Hon'ble Apex Court set aside the order of premature retirement on the ground that there was utter dearth of evidence for the Screening Committee to conclude that appellant's integrity was doubtful. Hon'ble Supreme Court held that judicial scrutiny of the orders of compulsory retirement was permissible if the order was either arbitrary or mala fide and based on no evidence.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 190 - Full Document

Government Of A.P. & Anr vs N. Ramanaiah on 14 May, 2009

"15. One more aspect that may have to be borne in mind is that Article 311(1) does not command that dismissal must be by the very same authority who made appointment or by its direct superior. The dismissal can be either by the appointing authority or by any other authority to which the appointing authority is subordinate. The dismissal of a civil servant must comply with the procedure laid down in Article 311."

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 25 - B S Reddy - Full Document

Rajasthan State Road Tranp. Corp. & Ors vs Babu Lal Jangir on 16 September, 2013

In the case of Rajasthan SRTC Vs. Babu Lal Jangir, Hon'ble Supreme Court allowed the appeal holding as under .

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 107 - A K Sikri - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Umedbhai M. Patel on 27 February, 2001

In State of Gujarat Vs. Umedbhai M. Patel cited supra Hon'ble Supreme Court settled the law relating to compulsory retirement under the FR 56 (j) as follows.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 276 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document