Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.48 seconds)
Ramashankar Kewat @ Pusai vs The State Of M.P on 2 November, 2022 cites

Board Of Control For Cricket, India & Anr vs Netaji Cricket Club & Ors on 10 January, 2005

Counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon a decision of Supreme Court reported in AIR 2005 SC 592 parties being (Board of Control for Cricket, India and another Vs. Netaji Cricket Club and others) in which Supreme Court has observed that review is maintainable when the Court has passed an order under misconception of law and according to him, this Court without considering the fact that allotment can also be made in favour of petitioners under the provision of Madhya Pradesh Gramo Me Ki Dakhalrahit Bhoomi (Vishesh Upbandh), Adhniam 1970 has passed the order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 381 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Brihaspati Bai Wd/O Chintaram Swarnkar vs Mohanlal Chintaram Swarnkar And Ors. on 23 April, 1994

Likewise, in a case of Brahaspati Bai Vs. State of M.P and others, (2009) 1 MPLJ 542, it is held that if a person is land less person and constructed the house over the land of the State Government Patta can be allotted under the provision of Madhya Pradesh Nagriya Kshetro ke Bhoomiheen Vyakti (Pattadhriti Adhikaron Ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniam 1984 (for short 'Adhiniam 1984').
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 6 - P P Naolekar - Full Document

Sadashiv Bharti vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 July, 2018

Counsel for intervenor has pointed out that Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.9436/2018 (Sadashiv Bharti Vs. State of M.P & ors) has directed for removal of encroachment over the land in question i.e khasra nos.261/3, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 and 271 for which the petitioner is held to be encroacher and as such authorities implementing the direction of the Division Bench removed the encroachment of the petitioner.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1