Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.24 seconds)
Sabrina Singh vs Alok Gupta on 28 July, 2025 cites

Geeta Poddar vs Satya Developers Private Limited on 31 August, 2022

Further reliance is placed upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in "Geeta Podar vs. Satya Developers Pvt. Ltd.: 2022/DHC/3359", and, "Shakti Pumps vs. Apex Buildsys (19.03.2025): OMP (COMM) 107/2024". Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.1 has submitted that the aforesaid judgments, as relied upon by ________________________________________________________________ Sabrina Singh vs. Alok Gupta Page No. 13 of 27 ARBTN NO. 42/2018 the Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner, pertains to the scope of appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and do not pertain to challenge to an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner has further placed his reliance upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in "Arjun Mall Retail Holdings Pvt.
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 5 - S Narula - Full Document

Arjun Mall Retail Holdings Pvt Ltd & Ors vs Gunocen Inc on 10 February, 2021

________________________________________________________________ Sabrina Singh vs. Alok Gupta Page No. 25 of 27 ARBTN NO. 42/2018 The nature of the need of the Petitioner for an amount of Rs.30,00,000/-remains unexplained and unspecified on record. Even if the amount was to be given in cash, no explanation has been provided as to why the agreement has been executed on such loose sheet of paper, cut at the bottom. There is nothing on record to infer anything about the financial capability of the Respondent No.1 to give a loan of such a huge amount in cash. Though in view of the decision in Mahavir Prasad Gupta (supra), this Court does not need to take the decision in Arjun Mall (supra) into further consideration, however the facts of the present case are distinguishable even from the facts of the Arjun Mall (supra) as in the present case except the loan agreement, the transaction in question is not corroborated by any other document or evidence on record.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Guwahati Municipal Corporation vs M/S International Construction Ltd. & ... on 5 May, 2014

iv. TRF Ltd. vs. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd.: AIR 2017 SC 3889 v. Voestalpine Schienen GmBH vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.: AIR 2017 SC 939 vi. Guwahati Municipal Corporation vs. ________________________________________________________________ Sabrina Singh vs. Alok Gupta Page No. 6 of 27 ARBTN NO. 42/2018 International Constructions Ltd.: AIR 2014 Gau 101.
Gauhati High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - U Bhuyan - Full Document
1   2 Next